C. Ve. Shanmugam: daily attention · articles + videos, per day
- C. Ve. Shanmugam
- Nainar Nagendran
- Vaiko
- partial data (news or video sources thin)
- gap = no data, not zero
- today — partial day
Videos are 64% of these mentions: on days when fewer YouTube channels were collected (hatched), a drop in the count is not a real fall. Default comparison: the neighbours in the same type by 30-day count.
| Week (from Mon) | C. Ve. Shanmugam: mentions | articles | videos | Nainar Nagendran | Vaiko |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Jun (partial) | 31 | 1 | 30 | 17 | 59 |
| 15 Jun | 27 | 1 | 26 | 54 | 117 |
| 22 Jun (partial) | 20 | 12 | 8 | 43 | 146 |
| 29 Jun (partial) | 39 | 16 | 23 | 34 | 207 |
| 6 Jul | 15 | 6 | 9 | 49 | 111 |
| 13 Jul | 45 | 29 | 16 | 39 | 97 |
| 20 Jul (partial) | 55 | 28 | 27 | 84 | 47 |
| 27 Jul (partial) | 39 | 18 | 21 | 22 | 38 |
| 3 Aug | 50 | 17 | 33 | 47 | 58 |
| 10 Aug | 68 | 34 | 34 | 127 | 14 |
| 17 Aug | 81 | 17 | 64 | 44 | 13 |
| 24 Aug | 81 | 29 | 52 | 31 | 32 |
| 31 Aug (partial) | 42 | 8 | 34 | 29 | 34 |
| 7 Sep | 97 | 36 | 61 | 93 | 81 |
| 14 Sep | 72 | 27 | 45 | 48 | 82 |
| 21 Sep (partial) | 133 | 33 | 100 | 55 | 32 |
| 28 Sep (partial) | 108 | 34 | 74 | 96 | 112 |
| 5 Oct | 41 | 21 | 20 | 99 | 66 |
| 12 Oct | 125 | 51 | 74 | 77 | 28 |
| 19 Oct (partial) | 14 | 8 | 6 | 43 | 104 |
“வென்றால் எடப்பாடி பழனிசாமி காரணம், தோற்றால் மாவட்ட செயலாளர்கள் காரணமா?” - சி.வி.சண்முகம்
“மதுராந்தகத்தில் வாக்குக்கு பணம் கொடுக்கிறது தவெக…” – சண்முகம் பரபரப்பு குற்றச்சாட்டு
Source: TamilTick Trends, 8 Jun–24 Oct 2026, 426 articles / 31 outlets, 757 videos / 34 channels · tamiltick.com/trends/leader/cve-shanmugam?range=all#chart
Positive 2.1%Neutral 35.0%Negative 62.9%Net tone −60.8 pts (±2.1)
Modelled by an AI model from headlines, not measured sentiment. 1,090 of 1,183 headlines in this window scored; bars under 30 scored are not drawn. How we count
- Positive
- Negative
- Neutral: the rest
- net tone (positive − negative), with the ±2.1-pt hand-label error band
- not enough scored headlines (<30)
- faded bar = partial day / week
The ±2.1-pt band is the gap between the model and hand labels on 200 headlines sampled across the state; it was not measured for any one leader, party or issue. Only positive calls get the second check; negative and neutral calls do not. Measured effect on 200 hand-labelled headlines (round 2): no positive/negative flips; 6 negative headlines, mostly denials and rebuttals, were read as neutral and 9 neutral ones as negative; net tone (positive − negative) came out within 2.1 points of the hand labels (Tamil Nadu 2.1 points more negative). Per class on those 200 headlines: positive precision 0.89, recall 0.94; negative precision 0.92, recall 0.94; neutral precision 0.90, recall 0.86.
Daily attention calendar · 8 Jun–24 Oct
- partial
- gap
- today — partial day
- 1peak day → its headlines
Source: TamilTick Trends, 8 Jun–24 Oct 2026, 426 articles / 31 outlets, 757 videos / 34 channels · tamiltick.com/trends/leader/cve-shanmugam#calendar
Issues named with it, against the usual rate · 8 Jun–24 Oct
- × the usual rate
- Elections & Bypolls5.6% of its mentions · 5.8% of all mentions×1.0
- Law & Order4.6% of its mentions · 9.1% of all mentions×0.5
- By-poll & Campaign1.6% of its mentions · 3.0% of all mentions×0.5
- Alliance & Coalitions1.4% of its mentions · 2.1% of all mentions×0.6
- NEET1.0% of its mentions · 1.2% of all mentions×0.8
- Farmers & Agriculture1.0% of its mentions · 2.2% of all mentions×0.5
Usual rate = the issue's share of all mentions in the region in the same window (tick); bar = its share of this entity's mentions. ×2.0 = named twice as often as usual, ×0.5 = half as often. Issues with fewer than 5 shared mentions are left out.
Most often named alongside · 8 Jun–24 Oct · at least 5 mentions
- Vijay14.0%166
- Edappadi K. Palaniswami11.6%137
- S. P. Velumani5.1%60
- M. K. Stalin2.5%29
- Aadhav Arjuna1.4%17
- C. T. R. Nirmal Kumar1.0%12
- Chennai (District)1.0%12
- Viluppuram (District)1.0%12
- Salem (District)0.9%10
- Chengalpattu (District)0.8%9
- Dindigul (District)0.4%5
Share of its mentions that also name them. Named together, not an alliance or endorsement.