Ramanathapuram (District)
Attention trend: steadyRamanathapuram: daily attention · articles + videos, per day
- Ramanathapuram
- Ranipet
- Pudukkottai
- partial data (news or video sources thin)
- gap = no data, not zero
- today — partial day
Videos are 74% of these mentions: on days when fewer YouTube channels were collected (hatched), a drop in the count is not a real fall. Default comparison: the neighbours in the same type by 30-day count.
| Day | Ramanathapuram: mentions | articles | videos | Ranipet | Pudukkottai |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 25 Sep | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sat, 26 Sep | 6 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| Sun, 27 Sep (partial) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Mon, 28 Sep (partial) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tue, 29 Sep (partial) | 9 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Wed, 30 Sep (partial) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Thu, 1 Oct (partial) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Fri, 2 Oct (partial) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| Sat, 3 Oct (partial) | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun, 4 Oct | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Mon, 5 Oct | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tue, 6 Oct | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Wed, 7 Oct | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Thu, 8 Oct | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Fri, 9 Oct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat, 10 Oct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Sun, 11 Oct | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Mon, 12 Oct | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Tue, 13 Oct | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Wed, 14 Oct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Thu, 15 Oct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Fri, 16 Oct | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat, 17 Oct | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Sun, 18 Oct | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| Mon, 19 Oct | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Tue, 20 Oct | 7 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
| Wed, 21 Oct | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Thu, 22 Oct | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 |
| Fri, 23 Oct | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Sat, 24 Oct | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Source: TamilTick Trends, 25 Sep–24 Oct 2026, 19 articles / 6 outlets, 53 videos / 16 channels · tamiltick.com/trends/district/ramanathapuram#chart
Positive 15.3%Neutral 36.1%Negative 48.6%Net tone −33.3 pts (±2.1)
Modelled by an AI model from headlines, not measured sentiment. 72 of 72 headlines in this window scored; bars under 30 scored are not drawn. How we count
- Positive
- Negative
- Neutral: the rest
- net tone (positive − negative), with the ±2.1-pt hand-label error band
- not enough scored headlines (<30)
- faded bar = partial day / week
The ±2.1-pt band is the gap between the model and hand labels on 200 headlines sampled across the state; it was not measured for any one leader, party or issue. Only positive calls get the second check; negative and neutral calls do not. Measured effect on 200 hand-labelled headlines (round 2): no positive/negative flips; 6 negative headlines, mostly denials and rebuttals, were read as neutral and 9 neutral ones as negative; net tone (positive − negative) came out within 2.1 points of the hand labels (Tamil Nadu 2.1 points more negative). Per class on those 200 headlines: positive precision 0.89, recall 0.94; negative precision 0.92, recall 0.94; neutral precision 0.90, recall 0.86.
Daily attention calendar · 8 Jun–24 Oct
- partial
- gap
- today — partial day
Source: TamilTick Trends, 8 Jun–24 Oct 2026, 57 articles / 15 outlets, 126 videos / 21 channels · tamiltick.com/trends/district/ramanathapuram#calendar
Issues named with it, against the usual rate · 25 Sep–24 Oct
- × the usual rate
- Health & Hospitals12.5% of its mentions · 1.5% of all mentions×8.1
- Law & Order6.9% of its mentions · 10.1% of all mentions×0.7
Usual rate = the issue's share of all mentions in the region in the same window (tick); bar = its share of this entity's mentions. ×2.0 = named twice as often as usual, ×0.5 = half as often. Issues with fewer than 5 shared mentions are left out.
Most often named alongside · 25 Sep–24 Oct · at least 5 mentions
- No one with 5+ mentions.
- No one with 5+ mentions.
- No one with 5+ mentions.
Share of its mentions that also name them. Named together, not an alliance or endorsement.